Greenpeace’s Energy [R]evolution scenario for Japan  shows that the country can leave all of its nuclear reactors  offline permanently.  “Despite the closure of all reactors, security of electricity supply is not threatened in Japan. The 2012 summer peak in electricity demand can be managed with energy efficiency, proper load balancing, and energy conservation,” said Hisayo Takada, Greenpeace Japan Climate and Energy Campaigner.

Greenpeace has long advocated the phase out of nuclear power.  In Japan the phase out has begun! It shouldn’t take another meltdown on US soil before America follows suit.

Need a refresher on ALEC? It’s the group that brings state legislators to the table with representatives from major corporations in the sectors of energy, healthcare, tobacco, private prisons, and other groups to manipulate state politics to maximize their profits and limit their liabilities. These companies help craft template bills for state legislators to bring home and introduce in their respective statehouses.

Documents obtained and published by Common Cause now give us a roster of specific attendees at ALEC’s environmental meetings, a consortium of state legislators and a who’s who of the most offensive polluting political heavyweights including: Koch Industries, ExxonMobil, Duke Energy and Peabody.  Participating legislators know well they’re walking into a dirty party, sometimes using state taxpayer money to foot the bill.

The corporations that fund ALEC are well known for their political spending on both sides of the aisle. ALEC funders include Koch Industries, known for its coordinated political spending against President Obama, and Duke Energy, which is laying down a ten million dollar line of credit to host the Democratic National Convention in their hometown of Charlotte, NC. But these polluting companies are co-conspirators under the banner of ALEC, where partisan politics are set aside to focus on the mission of destroying environmental protections, clean energy competition and liability for crimes against both people and the ecosystems sustaining us.

So what exactly are ALEC and these oil, coal, chemical and public relations companies focusing on tomorrow?

According to their newest meeting memorandum, ALEC’s Energy, Environment and Agriculture task force is going to discuss some pending model laws that ALEC will likely be approved for state distribution:

• The “Electricity Freedom Act” (really? Electricity Freedom?!) is a new attack on states with plans requiring companies to get a certain percentage of their electricity from renewable sources. This new bill is similar to other legislation ALEC has already peddled in several states and compliments an “email and telephone campaign” against state renewable energy standards, according to the Guardian.

• The “Coal Intrastate and Use Act” serves to prevent EPA from overruling state permits for coal mining and producing dirty coal products (like liquid coal for fuel) if all the coal operations are conducted within the borders of a single state.

• The “Resolution on U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement Accountability” mandates a report be filed on cities and states that have fallen short of their goals to reduce greenhouse gases through the Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, which has over 1,000 signatories. ALEC’s new resolution then demands that any program that hasn’t met its goal be canceled out right, voiding the Climate Protection Agreement altogether. Keeping in mind that ALEC’s members like Koch and Exxon have fought greenhouse gas programs at every turn for years, it is obvious that this ALEC bill is meant for one thing, attacking programs that address carbon emissions.

• A resolution demanding the passage of the notorious federal REINS Act, which would give Congress the power to block the enforcement of just about any federal protection–clean air and water laws, safeguards for mine workers, prohibiting tobacco sales to kids, protection from discrimination, you name it. It’s the ultimate gift from Congress to their corporate fundraisers who would like to avoid responsibility for…everything.

• The exhaustively-titled “Resolution Supporting a Reasonable Compliance Timeline and Economy-wide impact study of EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Rule” has a simple purpose: delay when coal-burning utilities have to reduce mercury pollution and other severely hazardous emissions. For major mercury polluters like Energy Future Holdings, American Electric Power, and Duke Energy, this is likely to be a popular item tomorrow.

Documents obtained and published by Common Cause also show us what ALEC’s focal points have been for other meetings in the last two years. Here are a few examples:

• A resolution urging Congress and the State Department to push through TransCanada’s Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. ALEC recycles a lofty jobs lie in their reasoning for this resolution, ignoring State Department KXL job estimates  under 2,000 and a Cornell study warning that “There is evidence to suggest that the effects of KXL construction could very well lead to more jobs being lost than are created.” How many jobs does ALEC assume? 120,000 — see Greenpeace’s letter to the SEC to understand how they were calculated by politics rather than reality. Go figure–the American Petroleum Institute and its largest members were in the room when this resolution was forged.

• A deceptive ALEC bill pushed by ExxonMobil that “discloses” chemicals used by the oil industry in fracking operations, but actually inserts loopholes to avoid disclosure of certain fracking chemicals. This bate-and-switch comes at a time when doctors are concerned about signing confidentiality agreements if they ask for disclosure of fracking chemicals when treating people who are exposed to chemicals from gas drilling.

• A resolution that would prevent EPA from recognizing coal ash as a hazardous substance (it contains neurotoxins, carcinogens and radioactive elements). This may well have served as the model for the coal ash amendment that is currently being tacked on to the federal transportation bill by Rep. David McKinley (R-WV). Coal ash was a repeated topic of discussion at ALEC’s energy task force meetings over the last two years, according to their meeting documents.

Who exactly attends these events? Beyond ALEC staff and dozens of corporate representatives, industry front groups are also represented. Tomorrow will feature John Felmy of the American Petroleum Institute in a presentation on gas prices (spoiler alert: this crowd will probably blame the President). Next up: presentations from representatives of the Edison Electric Institute (utility trade group) and the Nuclear Energy Institute (nuclear industry lobby).

Perhaps most intriguing will be a chat about “The Dirty Truth Behind Reusable Bags” led by Charles Gerba, who will warn attendees that reusable bags will give them “projectile vomiting and diarrhea.” Gerba may not mention this dramatic and messy sickness can be avoided by simply washing one’s reusable bags, since Mark Daniels of Hilex Poly (a plastic bag company) regularly attends these meetings, and Gerba serves as an advisor to Hilex Poly.

ALEC always gets some of industry’s most interesting mouthpieces to set the rhetorical tone for those attending ALEC’s anti-environmental jamborees. Looking back to last August at ALEC’s Energy, Environment, and Agriculture task force meeting in New Orleans, presenters included:

• Robert Bradley of the Institute for Energy Research, which made press recently when its sister group the American Energy Alliance spend $3.6 million on ads blaming the President for high gas prices. IER has a former Koch lobbyist on staff and has received $175,000 from Koch foundations in recent years as part of the climate denial network.

• Gerry Angevene of the Fraser Institute, another longtime player in the Koch- and Exxon-funded climate denial machine

• James Taylor of the Heartland Institute, which has helped champion ALEC efforts to confuse K-12 students about climate science. Heartland is currently in the middle of a crisis as corporate funders are distancing themselves from its comparison of terrorists and serial killers to those who recognize the reality of global warming. Seriously, they put the Unabomber on a billboard saying, “Do you still believe in global warming? I do. www.heartland.org”

• Craig Idso, whose nutjob Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change has been paid by the coal industry and the Heartland Institute to tell people that global warming is good for the planet. Craig Idso explained this nonsense to state legislators in August. As is the pattern here, see the Center’s history of Koch- and Exxon-funding, as well as Idso’s former employment at Peabody and work for the Western Fuels Association.

• Stephen Miller of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, which spends big on national advertisements promoting the idea that perhaps coal isn’t inherently dirty, dangerous and deadly (it is). Miller, who is resigning from ACCCE this year after serving as a dilligent coal apologist for the last decade, came under Congressional fire in 2009 when it was revealed that ACCCE contractors forged letters on behalf of groups “representing senior citizens, minorities and veterans,” including the NAACP.

Likely due to the publicity of ALEC Exposed and the recent mass migration of 16 companies and 34 state politicians away from ALEC (in response to controversial bills on voter suppression and Stand Your Ground laws that protected Trayvon Martin’s killer), ALEC no longer includes the specific members of its task forces in the documents it mails to participants beforehand. ALEC’s Energy task force as of June, 2011 shows the nefarious people who run this dirty operation, by name. People representing the following groups have been consistently present at recent ALEC meetings over the last couple years:

Oil and gas industry:

• Koch Industries
• ExxonMobil
• Shell Oil
• BP
• Chevron
• American Petroleum Institute
• Occidental Petroleum
• Marathon Oil
• Continental Resources
• American Gas Association (trade association)

Coal mining

• Peabody Energy
• Cloud Peak Energy

Coal-burning utilities:

• Duke Energy & Progress Energy (which are merging into the nation’s largest utility company)
• Energy Future Holdings
• American Electric Power
• PacifiCorp (a MidAmerican subsidiary, owned by Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway)
• Alliant Energy
• Pinnacle West
• MDU Resources
• NiSource
• NV Energy
• Edison Electric Institute (trade association, membership includes all utilities above)
• American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (membership includes AEP, Peabody, and Energy Future Holdings subsidiary Luminant)
• Salt River Project
• National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (an aggressive lobbying group for electrical utility cooperatives and top political donor in the energy sector)

Nuclear Industry:

• EnergySolutions
• Nuclear Energy Institute (trade association)
• Duke, Progress, AEP, and Pinnacle West all have notable nuclear generation capacity

Other major polluters:

• Dow Agrosciences
• International Paper
• American Chemistry Council (top trade association for chemical companies)
• Bayer Healthcare (Bayer is the country’s top air polluter according the Political Economy Research Institute at U-Mass, Amherst)
• Honeywell (#31 on PERI’s toxic air polluters list)
• General Motors (GM has a history of climate denial, although GM Foundation just dumped the Heartland Institute)
• LyondellBasell Industries (third largest chemical company in the world)

Front groups, all involved in climate science denial (Koch funding since 2005):

• Americans for Prosperity ($5,760,781)
• Atlas Economic Research Foundation ($152,600)
• Commonwealth Foundation ($84,532)
• Goldwater Institute ($70,427)
• John Locke Foundation ($47,472)
• Heartland Institute ($25,000)

Public Relations Firms

Dezenhall Resources (What Businessweek calls the “Pit Bull of Public Relations,” Dezenhall Resources is currently included in a Greenpeace lawsuit due to its role in hiring spies on behalf of chemical companies to track Greenpeace’s internal campaign plans)

With tomorrow’s scheduled shutdown of Japan’s Tomari nuclear power plant the country will be free from nuclear power for the first time since 1966. Can it seize this historic opportunity? Here at Greenpeace we believe it can.

All of Japan’s 54 nuclear reactors will be offline. Now, the country’s government must learn from its mistakes of the past, listen to its people and scientists, keep reactors offline, and usher in Japan’s renewable and sustainable future. History is within their grasp.

There will never be a better time. Since the terrible events of March 11 last year when an earthquake and tsunami triggered the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Japan has shown that nuclear power can be abandoned quickly and with an invisible impact on people’s daily lives.  The Minister for Economy, Trade and Industry Yukio Edano has said there will be no restrictions on electricity use or rolling blackouts.

The operator of the destroyed Fukushima reactors, Tokyo Electric Power added “for the electricity supply and demand in the foreseeable future, we expect to maintain stable supply.” If there are electricity shortages this summer it will be the fault of the government who instead of properly planning energy conservation and pouring resources into renewables have been obsessed with restarting Japan’s discredited nuclear reactors as fast as possible.

So why is the government frantically trying to restart the country’s reactors without the consent of the people living nearby? Why should the people of Japan suffer more nuclear risks? The country’s nuclear reactors and infrastructure are in no state to withstand another major earthquake that experts warn is almost inevitable.

The nuclear industry is clearly terrified that if Japan sees it can live without this dangerous and expensive technology then it’s game over for them. The fantastic example being set by Japan can only encourage other countries to follow suit.

(The truth is there in black and white. Last week French nuclear giant AREVA released its revenue figures for the first three months of 2012. The company says that “order cancellations as a result of the Fukushima accident” have cost it 612 million euros. Its Nuclear Reactors and Services Business Group’s revenue increased by just 5.8%. It’s Renewable Energies Business Group’s revenue is up by a massive 198%.)

Greenpeace’s Energy [R]evolution scenario for Japan (here in Japanese and English), released in September 2011, shows that the country can leave all of its nuclear plants offline permanently and still meet its 2020 greenhouse gas emission reduction targets via energy efficiency, renewable energy, and the smart management of the demand for energy.

The path to the future stretches out before the Japanese government. It can turn back or step forward. To abandon nuclear power and fully embrace renewable energy would take just a fraction of the courage shown by the Japanese people since March 11 2011. Those who have suffered in the last year and continue to suffer today deserve nothing less.

Blogpost by Justin McKeating.

The town of Pripyat that was left abandoned after the nuclear disaster. © Greenpeace / Steve Morgan

Today is the 26^th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. It is a disaster that left a 30-kilometre uninhabitable exclusion zone, displaced hundreds of thousands of people, and still threatens the lives of tens of thousands.

The legacy of the day that Chernobyl’s Reactor Four exploded, throwing radioactive contamination across Europe, is still with us and will be for many years to come. We must never forget the magnitude of the disaster and the people who suffered then and continue to suffer now as Greenpeace found when we returned to the area surrounding Chernobyl last year.

It’s 26 years later and what have the nuclear industry and its supporters learned?

Nothing.

The nuclear industry still hasn’t realized or admitted that its reactors are unsafe. Reactors are vulnerable to any unforeseen combination of technological failures, human errors and natural disasters. That puts the tens of millions of people living near the worlds more than 400 reactors at risk.

Instead of learning, the nuclear industry continues to push for new nuclear reactors despite Chernobyl, despite near-misses in Sweden and South Korea, and despite the triple nuclear meltdown at Fukushima and it’s disastrous consequences in March last year.

(A map comparing fallout from reactor accidents in Chernobyl and in Fukushima. Significant radiation contamination from both will last for centuries.)

Nuclear power still has not found a way to finance itself without begging for subsidies from taxpayers. This is an industry that has been living off blank cheques from governments for the last 60 years. Private backers just aren’t interested. Nuclear is a “corporate killer” and a “dream that failed”.

The nuclear companies that aren’t getting their hands on the billions of public cash needed to build new reactors are on the run. RWE and E.ON have pulled out of their plans to build new plants in the UK. Bulgaria has just cancelled its plans to build reactors at the Belene plant.

There are countries, however, that are leading the way from nuclear to a renewable future. Germany, Italy, Belgium and Switzerland are all turning away from nuclear power. Just one of 54 reactors is operating in Japan now with the impact on people invisible. Japan is also showing right now that nuclear power isn’t needed.

So today we remember the terrible legacy of Chernobyl and the price paid by the people. But we also pledge another legacy: one of a sustainable future built on safe and clean energy. It’s within our grasp.

Occupation of a watch tower on the Belene site with the mothballed construction in the background that was stopped in 1992 and was to be torn down completely in 2009. - (c) Greenpeace / Prochazka

Yet more news in the past week about how bad an investment nuclear power is. In Bulgaria a plan to build a nuclear power plant was cancelled while in the UK plans to build two new plants were thrown into chaos.